物种敏感度分布及其在生态毒理学中的应用Species Sensitivity Distribution and Its Application in Ecotoxicology
陈波宇;郑斯瑞;牛希成;赵劲松;
摘要(Abstract)：
物种敏感度分布是一种基于单物种测试的外推方法,其在生态毒理学中的应用近年来已成为研究热点.论文阐述了物种敏感度分布在生态毒理学的应用背景,以及其基本内涵与研究步骤,同时介绍了物种敏感度分布在生态毒理学中应用的两个方面:制定污染物的环境质量标准和对污染生态系统的生态风险评价,并对物种敏感度分布的不确定性和研究的发展趋势进行了讨论.
关键词(KeyWords)： 物种敏感度分布;生态风险评价;环境质量标准
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(No.40601085);; 国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2008BADA7B01)
作者(Author): 陈波宇;郑斯瑞;牛希成;赵劲松;
Email:
DOI:
参考文献(References)：
- Aldenberg T,Slob W.1993.Confidence limits for hazardousconcentrations based on log-logistically distributed NOEC toxicitydata[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,25(1):48-63
- Aldenberg T,Jaworska J S.2000.Uncertainty of the hazardousconcentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivitydistributions[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,46(1):1-18
- Awkerman J A,Raimondo S,Barron M G.2008.Developmentof species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspeciestoxicity correlation models[J].Environmental Science&Technology,42(9):3447-3452
- Brattin W J,Barry T M,Chiu N.1996.Monte Carlo modelingwith uncertain probability density functions[J].Human andEcological Risk Assessment,2(4):820-840
- Caldwell D J,Mastrocco F,Hutchinson T H,L覿nge R,HeijerickD,Janssen C,Anderson P D,Sumpter J P.2008.Derivation ofan aquatic predicted no-effect concentration for the synthetichormone,17α-ethinyl estradiol[J].Environmental Science&Technology,42(19):7046-7054
- CCME.1996.A Protocol for the Derivation of EnvironmentalHealth and Human Health Soil Quality Guidelines[R].CCME-EPC-101E.En108-4/8-1996E.Winnipeg,Manitoba,Canada:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment
- CCME.1999.Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines[R].Winnipeg,Canada:Canadian Council of Ministers of theEnvironment
- Chapman P M,Fairbrother A,Brown D.1998.A critical evaluationof safety(uncertainty)factors for ecological risk assessment[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,17(1):99-108
- Cheng Y,Zhou J Y,Shan Z J,Chen J Q.2005.A review ofecological risk assessment of pesticide at home and abroad[J].Rual Eco-Environment,21(3):62-66(in Chinese)
- Crommentuijn T,Kalf D F,Polder M D,Posthumus R,Van dePlassche.E J.1997.Maximum permissible concentrations andnegligible concentrations for pesticides[R].RIVM Report601501002and annexes.Bilthoven,the Netherlands:National Institute ofPublic Health and the Environment
- D’Agostino R B.1986.Graphical analysis[A]//D’Agostino RB,Stephens M A.Goodness-of-Fit Techniques[C],New York,NY:Marcel Dekker,7-62
- Durda J L,Preziosi D V.2000.Data quality evaluation oftoxicological studies used to derive ecotoxicological benchmarks[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment,6(5):747-765
- Erickson R J,Stephan C E.1988.Calculation of the FinalAcute Value for Water Quality Criteria for Aquatic Organisms[R].PB88-214994.Springfield,VA,USA:National TechnicalInformation Service
- Forbes T L,Forbes V E.1993.A critique of the use ofdistribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology[J].Functional Ecology,7(3):249-254
- Frampton G K,Jnsch S,Scott-Fordsmand J J,R觟mbke J,Vanden Brink P J.2006.Effects of pesticides on soil invertebratesin laboratory studies:a review and analysis using speciessenstivity distributions[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,25(9):2480-2489
- Hart A.2002.The Use of Species Sensitivity Distributions inAvian Risk Assessments for Pesticide Registration[A]//PosthumaL,Suter II G W,Traas T P.Species sensitivity distributions inecotoxicology[C].Boca Raton:Lewis Publisher,516-517
- Hopkin S P.1993.Ecological implications of“95%protectionlevels”for metals in soil[J].Oikos,66(1):137-141
- Klapow L A,Lewis R H.1979.Analysis of toxicity data forCalifornia marine water quality standards[J].Journal of theWater Pollution Control Federation,51(8):2054-2070
- Klepper O,Bakker J,Traas T P,Van de Meent D.1998.Mapping the potentially affected fraction(PAF)of species as abasis for comparison of ecotoxicological risks between substancesand regions[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,61(1-3):337-344
- Klimisch H J,Andreae M,Tillmann U.1997.A systematicapproach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicologicaland ecotoxicological data[J].Regulatory Toxicology andPharmacology,25(1):1-5
- Kooijman S A L M.1987.A safety factor for LC50valuesallowing for differences in sensitivity among species[J].WaterResearch,21:269-276
- Kwok K W H,Bjorgeseter A,Leung K M Y,Lui G C S,Gray J S,Shin P K S,Lam P K S.2008.Deriving site-specific sediment quality guidelines for Hong Kong marineenvironments using field-based species sensitivity distributions[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,27(1):226-234
- Lei B L,Huang S B,Wang Z J.2009.Theories and methodsof ecological risk assessment[J].Progress in Chemistry,21(2/3):350-358(in Chinese)
- Maltby L,Brock T C M,van den Brink P J.2009.Fungiciderisk assessment for aquatic ecosystems:importance of interspecificvariation,toxic mode of action,and exposure regime[J].Environmental Science&Technology,43(19):7556-7563
- Michael J R,Schucany W R.1986.Analysis of data from censored samples[A]//D’Agostino R B,Stephens M A.Goodness-of-Fit Techniques[C].New York,NY:Marcel Dekker,461-496
- Newman M C,Ownby D R,Mézin L C A,Powell D C,Christensen T R L,Lerberg S B,Anderson B A.2000.Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological riskassessment:Assumptions of distribution type and sufficientnumbers of species[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,19(2):508-515
- Newman M C,Unger M A.2002.Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology[M].Boca Raton,FL:Lewis Publishers
- OECD.1992.Report of the OECD Workshop on the Extrapolationof Laboratory Aquatic Toxicity Data to the Real Environment[R].OECD Environment Monograph No.59.Paris,France:Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Parkhurst D F.1998.Arithmetic versus geometric means forenvironmental concentration data[J].Environmental Science&Technology,32(3):92-98
- Posthuma L,Suter II G W,Traas T P.2002.Species sensitivitydistributions in ecotoxicology[C].Boca Raton,FL:LewisPublishers
- Raimondo S,Vivian D N,Delos C,Barron M G.2008.Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrationsfor acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,27(12):2599-2607
- Schuler L J,Rand G M.2008.Aquatic risk assessment ofherbicides in freshwater ecosystems of south Florida[J].Archivesof Environmental Contamination and Toxicology,54(4):571-583
- Semenzin E,Temminghoff E J M,Marcomini A.2007.Improving ecological risk assessment by including bioavailabilityinto species sensitivity distributions:an example for plantsexposed to nickel in soil[J].Environmental Pollution,148(2):642-647
- Smith E P,Cairns Jr J.1993.Extrapolation methods for settingecological standards for water quality:statistical and ecologicalconcerns[J].Ecotoxicology,2(3):203-219
- Smit M G D,Holthaus K I E,Trannum H C,Neff J M,Kjeilen-Eilertsen G,Jak R G,Singsaas I,Huijbregts M A J,Hendriks A J.2008.Species sensitivity distributions for suspendedclays,sediment burial,and grain size change in the marineenvironmen[tJ].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,27(4):1006-1012
- Stephens M A.1986.Tests based on EDF statistics[A]//D’Agostino R B,Stephens M A.Goodness-of-Fit Techniques[C].New York,NY:Marcel Dekker
- Suter II G W.1993.Ecological Risk Assessment[C].BocaRaton,FL:Lewis Publishers,538
- Tomlin C D S.1997.The pesticide manual[R].Farnham,UK:British Crop Protection Council
- US EPA.1984.AQUIRE,Aquatic Information Retrieval ToxicityDatabase:Project Description,Guidelines and Procedures[R]. EPA600/8-84-021.Duluth,MN,USA:Environmental ResearchLaboratory,Office of Research and Development,United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency
- US EPA.1992.Framework for ecological risk assessment[R].EPA/630/R-92/001.Washington DC,USA:Risk AssessmentForum,United States Environmental Protection Agency
- US EPA.1993.Technical basis for deriving sediment qualitycriteria for nonionic organic contaminants for the protection ofbenthic organisms by using equilibrium partitioning[R].EPA-822-R-93-001.Washington DC,USA:Office of Water,UnitedStates Environmental Protection Agency
- US EPA.1998.Guidelines for ecological risk assessment[R].EPA/630/R-95/002F.Washington DC,USA:National Center forEnvironmental Assessment,U S Environmental Protection Agency
- Van Straalen N M.2002.Threshold models for speciessensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc[J].Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology,11(3-4):167-172
- Vighi M,Finizio A,Villa S.2006.The evolution of theenvironmental quality concept:from the US EPA Red Book tothe European Water Framework Directive[J].EnvironmentalScience and Pollution Research,13(1):9-14
- Wagner C,Lokke H.1991.Estimation of ecotoxicologicalprotection levels from NOEC toxicity data[J].Water Research,25(10):1237-1242
- Wang B,Yu G,Huang J,Hu H Y.2008.Development ofspecies sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5oforganochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches[J].Ecotoxicology,17(8):716-724
- Wang L S.2004.Chemistry of Organic Pollution[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press(in Chinese)
- Wheeler J R,Grist E P M,Leung K M Y,Morritt D,CraneM.2002.Species sensitivity distributions:data and model choice[J].Marine Pollution Bulletin,45(1-12):192-202
- Xi D L,Sun Y S,Liu X Y.2004.Environmental Monitoring(3rd Edition)[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press(in Chinese)
- 程燕,周军英,单正军,陈建群.2005.国内外农药生态风险评价研究综述[J].农村生态环境,21(3):62-66
- 雷炳莉,黄圣彪,王子健.2009.生态风险评价理论和方法[J].化学进展,21(2/3):350-358
- 王连生.2004.有机污染化学[M].北京:高等教育出版社
- 奚旦立,孙裕生,刘秀英.2004.环境监测(第3版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社