于彩虹;胡琳娜;胡东青;王晓军;姜辉;林荣华;

• 1:中国矿业大学(北京)化学与环境工程学院
• 2:青岛出入境检验检疫局
• 3:农业部农药检定所环境室

摘要(Abstract)：

建立适宜的农药环境风险评价体系,有利于评价农药对环境的影响,控制农药带来的环境污染。欧盟具有丰富的农药风险评价经验和完善的评价体系,论文针对欧盟的初级风险评价工作中水生生物风险评价的标准物种不确定因子法进行了综述,阐述了其评价原则与方法,总结了预测环境浓度(predicted environmental concentration,PEC)和法规允许浓度(regulatory acceptable concentration,RAC)的建立,分析了存在的问题并提出了发展方向,以期为中国农药风险评价提供技术支持。针对标准物种不确定因子法过于严格的情况,并考虑中国农药环境风险评价的现状,建议在熟悉掌握初级风险评价技术的基础上,逐步推动高级风险评价。

关键词(KeyWords)： 欧盟;农药;水生生物风险评价;标准生物种;不确定因子法

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2009QH11);; 农药风险评估综合配套技术研究项目(农业部行业科技项目)

作者(Author): 于彩虹;胡琳娜;胡东青;王晓军;姜辉;林荣华;

Email:

DOI:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]顾宝根,程燕,周军英,等.美国农药生态风险评价技术[J].农药学学报,2009,11(3):283-290Gu B G,Cheng Y,Zhou J Y,et al.Review on USApesticide ecological risk assessment techniques[J].Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science,2009,11(3):283-290(in Chinese)
• [2]魏启文,陶传江,宋稳成,等.农药风险评估及其现状与对策研究[J].农产品质量与安全,2010(2):38-42
• [3]Pinto M I,Sontag G,Bernardino R J,et al.Pesticidein water and the performance for the liquid-phase mi-croextraction based techniques:A review[J].Micro-chemical Journal,2010,96(2):225-237
• [4]王颜红,李国琛,王世成,等.欧盟农药风险评价发展现状[J].农药,2008,47(8):547-554,557Wang Y H,Li G C,Wang S C,et al.Current statusof risk assessment of pesticides in European Union[J].Agrochemicals,2008,47(8):547-554,557(in Chinese)
• [5]Robert L L,Robert P M,Margaret L P,et al.Chemicals in the environment:An overview[C]//Lipnick R.ACS Symposium Series Chemicals in theEnvironment.Washington D C:American ChemicalSociety,2002:1-24
• [6]USEPA(United States Environmental Protection A-gency).Guidelines for Ecological Risk AssessmentEPA/630/R-95/002F[S].Washington D C:FederalRegister,1998
• [7]EC(European Commission).Guidance Document onAquatic Ecotoxicology in the Context of the Directive91/414/EEC(SANCO/3268/2001)[S].Revision 4.Brussels:European Commission,Health and Con-sumer Protection Directorate-General,2002
• [8]王蔚,陈隆智,高希武.环境农药残留与毒理学终点在环境风险评估中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2):375?378Wang W,Chen W L,Gao X W.EEC/PEC and toxi-cological endpoint in environmental risk assessment[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2006,22(2):375-378(in Chinese)
• [9]Ale B J M.Risk analysis and risk policy in the Neth-erlands and the EEC[J].Journal of Loss Preventionin the Process Industries,1991,4(1):58-64
• [10]EC(European Commission).Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing ofplant protection products on the market[J].OfficialJournal of the European Union L,1991,230:1-32
• [11]EC(European Commission).Regulation(EC)No1107/2009 of the European Parliament and the Coun-cil of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plantprotection products on the market and repealingCouncil Directive 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC[J].Official Journal of the European Union L,2009,309:1-50
• [12]EC(European Commission).Directive 2009/128/ECof the European Parliament and the Council of 21 Oc-tober 2009 establishing a framework for communityaction to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides[J].Official Journal of the European Union L,2009,309:71-86
• [13]Campbell P J,Arnold D J S,Brock T C M,et al.Guidance Document on Higher-tier Aquatic Risk As-sessment for Pesticides(HARAP)[M].Brussels:SETAC-Europe,1999:179
• [14]Brock T C M,Alix A,Brown C D,et al.Linking A-quatic Exposure and Effects:Risk Assessment ofPesticides[M].New York:CRC Press,2010:25-
• [15]FOCUS(Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide FateModels and Their Use).FOCUS Surface Water Scenari-os in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC:ECDocument Reference SANCO/4802/2001[S].Revision2.Washington D C:FOCUS Working Group on SurfaceWater Scenarios,2001
• [16]FOCUS(Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide FateModels and Their Use).Guidance Document on Estima-ting Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environ-mental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration:ECDocument Reference SANCO/10058/2005[S].Revision2.0.Washington D C:FOCUS Working Group on Deg-radation Kinetics,2005
• [17]FOCUS(Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide FateModels and Their Use).Landscape and Mitigation Fac-tors in Aquatic Risk Assessment.Volume 1.Extendedand Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment:EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005[R].Re-vision 2.0.Washington D C:FOCUS Working Group onLandscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk As-sessment,2007
• [18]FOCUS(Forum for the Co-ordination of Pesticide FateModels and Their Use).Landscape and Mitigation Fac-tors in Aquatic Risk Assessment.Volume 2.DetailedTechnical Reviews:EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005[R].Revision 2.0.Washington D C:FO-CUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Fac-tors in Ecological Risk Assessment,2007
• [19]Giesy J P,Graney R L.Recent developments in andintercomparisons of acute and chronic bioassays andbioindicators[J].Hydrobiologia,1989,188-189(1):21-60
• [20]Alistair B A B,Colin D B,Katie L B.Higher-tier la-boratory methods for assessing the aquatic toxicity ofpesticides[J].Pest Management Science,2002,58(7):637-648
• [21]杨永珍.中国农药安全管理[C]//江树人.农药与环境安全国际会议论文集.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:19-25Yang Y Z.Safety management of pesticide in China[C]//Jiang S R.Proceedings of International Sympo-sium on Pesticide and Environmental Safety.Beijing:China Agriculture University Press,2003:19-25(in Chinese)